Wednesday, February 23, 2011
Several dominance matrices and linear models later, we found that marmots in better body condition were more dominant and produced more offspring. In addition, higher ranking males had greater reproductive success than those of lower rank. Dominance had no influence on yearling dispersal, but individuals in better body condition were less likely to leave the natal territory.
This project really helped me realize the importance of each social interaction between marmots. Because marmots spend most of their time doing other things, such as foraging or avoiding predation, these relatively rare interactions can potentially be quite revealing. Each interaction can offer greater insight and better define marmot sociality.
It would be interesting to see whether these patterns still apply many decades later. As the environment changes, many species, including marmots, may adapt new behaviors to adapt to their evolving surroundings. But for now, I suppose size matters after all!
Look out for our paper on this study later this year in Ethology!
Outside of marmot research, I have also participated in other field research as a student of the Field/Marine Biology Quarter (FMBQ). In the fall of 2009, I traveled to the US Virgin Islands to study the effects of ecotourism (primarily camera flashes and shutter noises) on tropical lizards. In other words, my group-mates and I ran around the islands scaring every other lizard in sight. Here is a picture of me searching for those poor, unsuspecting lizards.
For any undergrads reading this blog, I highly recommend participating in a FMBQ if you have the opportunity. It was one of the most defining and rewarding experiences of my undergrad career. And the tropical destination wasn't too bad either :) !
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Hello! My name is Rachel Stafford-Lewis and I am currently a sophomore undergraduate student majoring in Biology here at UCLA. As exemplified by the picture above of me with a horse, I am a huge animal person. Because of this and because of my interest in pursuing research, I was ecstatic when asked to join “team marmot” to assist with their research this quarter.
I had actually never heard of a marmot before this opportunity and I have come to realize that they are adorable creatures with intricate social networks that interact much like you and me.
My job will be to decipher these various social interactions and, more specifically, to analyze the maternal effects on these social networks. For now, I am doing computer-based analyses (see below), which includes creating dendrograms from the past year’s data collection in the field and assigning individual marmots to specific groups. Once I am acquainted with the each marmot’s social behaviors, I will investigate the factors shaping variation in the social interactions among individual marmots.
In the future I hope to travel with my fellow RMBL researchers to the Rocky Mountains so I can aid in the study of these magnificent creatures. The study of these particular marmots has been multi-generational and has been the basis of our research for many years, so I am thrilled to get hands-on experience, and learn from the best!
Monday, February 7, 2011
(All photos courtesy of Dan Blumstein)
Well, most mammals also rely heavily on their sense of smell, so a natural next question was, do the marmots respond differently to the smells of different predators. But how do you consistently and safely present the smell of predators to marmots? Why, you go online and buy animal urine, of course. And thus the next year found marmoteers traipsing around the sites with bottles of predator pee. Very convenient, but quite smelly (which, I suppose, was the point after all). Sure enough, the marmots reacted differently to smells of different predators.
Predictably, those results led to yet another question, which was (you guessed it), How do marmots respond to the sight of different predators? And yes, one year later found us out at RMBL with life-sized cardboard cutouts of a fox, a coyote, a wolf, a mountain lion, and a dik-dik (a small African antelope used as a control in this case).
And suddenly we faced an unusual and previously unknown space issue. After all, bottles of urine take up very little space, and the acoustic equipment, while very heavy, took up a relatively compact amount of space. The fox and dik-dik were small and easy to handle. The coyote was pretty manageable. It started getting tougher with the wolf, which was pretty tall and pretty long. But ultimately, it was the mountain lion, specifically its tail, that really complicated matters.
The mountain lion's tail presented a unique spatial challenge.
Mornings became a clown car act, cramming all the animal cutouts, trapping and observation gear, a big box for another experiment going on at the time, and oh yeah, four or five researchers into the field car. Someone was always up close and personal with the mountain lion’s tail, and the animals themselves were always lay cozily one on top of the other, coyote snuggled up to antelope pressed against wolf. Taking everything out was only marginally better. Often, we found ourselves walking through RMBL or along the road with predators in hand, to the curious stares of passers-by. I like to think that we livened up many a tourist’s morning that summer. And the outcome of it all? Yes, the marmots respond differently to the sight of different predators.
Of course, in nature, predators give off multiple signals, so now, short of moving onto the taste or feel of predators, the next logical question seems to be, How do marmots respond to combinations of multiple predator signals? I’m looking forward to the results of the next experiment with a composite predator effect…but I sure don’t envy the driver of that car.
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Meet the researchers, see the field site and learn some interesting facts about marmots along they way.